Web Survey Bibliography
As market researchers with a qualitative focus, our aim is to explore and understand both the rational and the emotional drivers that move consumers and shape their behavior. This requires that we get close to the consumers reality, which today is increasingly both online and offline – and therefore our research takes place online as well as face to face.
Research showed us that face to face and online research offer different advantages and requirements regarding the use of certain techniques and the respective kinds of outcome. We consider these differences as a great chance if both kinds of research are implemented and combined skillfully – but also as problematic if ignored.
So far, the necessity or usefulness of online research is justified almost entirely pragmatically: E.g. it reaches immobile target groups, offers flexibility for moderators and clients and for some – especially younger or professional target group – it is the familiar means of communication. We however think that it is important to also consider the methodological and content-based specialties and advantages of online research. We therefore explored the differences between the progression and results of online and face to face research more systematically and qualitatively by conducting four focus groups, two online and two face to face, with identical questions and similar questioning techniques. Our analysis showed that different subjects, stimulus materials and questioning techniques are more or less appropriate and successful in either form of group discussion. It also revealed clear differences in mode and content of answers, e.g. that different results are gained regarding the openness to express ones opinion and the kind of emotional involvement. Thus, the question whether it is more appropriate to conduct qualitative research online or face to face can only be answered by considering the topic and the desired results. For more complex research designs online and face to face research can complement each other in an iterative research process.
Conference homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography - Marketing/business (336)
- Effects of Response Formats when Measuring Attitudes in Consumer Web Surveys Across Markets.; 2011; Couper, M. P., Nunge, E.
- What it takes to be a top 100 website; 2010
- The multidimensional integral business survey response model; 2010; Bavdaz, M.
- Site-intercpet survey best practices; 2010; Henning, J.
- Overview of data collection methodology; 2010
- Demographics of mechanical Turk. Ceder working papers; 2010; Ipeirotis, P. G.
- Innovative mobile research in developing countries; 2010; Bellity, E.
- Mobile location based research: Cross cultural examination of coffee culture; 2010; Morden, M., Ferneyhough, C., Grenville, A.
- Online research….and all that Jazz!; 2010; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
- Why are we trying to create new communities for market research purposes?; 2010; Pearson, C., Kateley, V.
- Globalpark Annual Market Research Software Survey 2009; 2010; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- An Analyze of the Zero Price Effect on Online Business Performance - An Research Based on the Mobile...; 2010; Liu, Y., Yuan, P.
- From clipboards to online research communities; 2010; Poynter, R., Cierpicki, S., Lorch, J., Zuo, B., Davis, C., Eddy, C.
- Codebook and explanatory note on the WageIndicator dataset ; 2010; Tijdens, K., van Zijl, S., Hughie-Williams, M., van Klaveren, M., Steinmetz, S.
- When the water is right.; 2010; Andruss, P.
- Time Related Inconsistencies in Global Online Panels; 2010; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
- Study of Non-Probability Sample Internet Surveys' Estimates of Consumer Product Usage and Demographic...; 2010; Yeager, D. S., Carter, A., Tewoldemedhin, H., Krosnick, J. A.
- Testing the Applicability of Respondent Driven Sampling as an Online Research Method to Sample Hidden...; 2010; Pajak, D.
- Enrichment of Qualitative Research through Online Approaches: New Insights due to Online CoCreation...; 2010; Krischke-Ramaswamy, M., Knorr, H.
- Theoretical model of context-sensitive mobile methods; 2010; Maxl, E.
- Using Propensity Score Weighting to Reduce Bias of a Swiss Market Research Web Panel; 2010; Wiegand, G., Jella, H., Beat, H., Stefan, L.
- Designing Web Surveys in Marketing Research: Does Use of Forced Answering Affect Completion Rates?; 2010; Albaum, G., Roster, C. A.,Wiley, J. B., Rossiter, J., Smith, S. M.
- The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet...; 2010; Bonke, J., Fallesen, P.
- An Experiment With an Employment Sector Question; 2010; Finno, A. A., Kohout, J.
- Online polls burnish image - Daily tracking surveys are increasingly used by companies with dents on...; 2010; Bialik, C.
- Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies; 2010; Geist, M. R.
- Response format effects on measurement of employment; 2009; Thomas, R. K., Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D.
- MarketTools TrueSample; 2009
- ISO 26362 Access panels in market, opinion, and social research-Vocabulary and service requirements; 2009
- Exploring mode effects in a panel survey of new businesses; 2009; Santos, B., DesRoches, D.
- The 2008 Confirmit Annual Market Research Software Survey; 2009; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Measuring Internet And Press Audience In The Media Convergence Era. In Search Of A New Paradigm In Researching...; 2009; Pawlak, J., Póltorak, M.
- The Decline And Fall Of The Response Rate: The Fightback ; 2009; Green, A., Staplehurst, S., Windle, R.
- Effects of incentives and the Big Five personality dimensions on internet panellists' ratings; 2009; Larson, A. J., Sachau, D. A.
- Using Non-Probability Samples for Confusion Surveys - Mall Intercepts and the Internet; 2009; Ericksen, E. P.
- Factors Contributing to Participation in Web‐based Surveys among Italian University Graduates; 2009; Cimini, C., Girottu, C., Gasperoni, G.
- Integration of different data collection techniques using the propensity score; 2009; Camillo, F., Conti, V., Ghiselli, S.
- The Effect of Email Invitation Customization on Survey Completion Rates in an Internet Panel: A Meta...; 2009; Callegaro, M., Kruse, Y., Thomas, M., Nukulkij, P.
- Comparison Study of Early Adopter Attitudes and Online Behavior in Probability and Non-Probability Web...; 2009; Dennis, J. M., Osborn, L., Semans, K.
- Turning Grid Questions into Sequences in Business Web Surveys; 2009; Haraldsen, G., Bergstrøm, Y.
- The Electronic Questionnaire Experience in Business Surveys: mode effects on quality and on response...; 2009; Biffignandi, S., Siesto, G., Zeli, A.
- Findings from consumer surveys on Internet Shopping: A comparison of pre and post study consumer research...; 2009; Anonymous
- Representativeness of Mobile Internet Surveys - A comparative study of CAMI vs. CATI ; 2009; Maier, U., Neubarth, W., Grosser, A., Hombach, A.
- The use of online data-collection in financial services market measurement research : the FRS experience...; 2009; Cooke, M., Watkins, N.
- Market Research Online and Offline - Differences in output and processing of Qualitative Online and...; 2009; Knorr, H., Krischke-Ramaswamy, M.
- Volumetric Forecast based on Online Access Panels; 2009; Rodenhausen, T., Drewes, F.
- How representative are sentiments expressed in social media for the marketing target audience? A comparison...; 2009; Jarchow, C., Thomas, J.
- Advertising Effects of Online Video Ads; 2009; Wolf, M., Schönfeldt, J.
- Diffusion of Mobile Services Adoption in Taiwan; 2009; Doong, H.-S., Wang, H.-C.
- AGOF internet facts – increasing the response rate for onsite-surveys; 2009; Foerstel, H.